文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Evaluating low-carbon competitiveness under a DPSIR-Game Theory-TOPSIS model-A case study

作者：Peng, Tao Jin, Zhiyuan Xiao, Lujun

第一作者：彭涛

通信作者：Jin, ZY[1]|[14440af7d35a897dbedac]金志远;

机构：[1]Guizhou Inst Technol, Guiyang 550003, Guizhou, Peoples R China;[2]Guizhou Inst Technol, Sch Min Engn, Guiyang 550003, Guizhou, Peoples R China;[3]Third Peoples Hosp Guiyang, Guiyang 550006, Guizhou, Peoples R China

第一机构：贵州理工学院

通信机构：corresponding author), Guizhou Inst Technol, Sch Min Engn, Guiyang 550003, Guizhou, Peoples R China.|贵州理工学院矿业工程学院;贵州理工学院;

年份：2022

卷号：24

期号：4

起止页码：5962-5990

外文期刊名：ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85111906500);WOS:【SSCI(收录号:WOS:000681578100001)，SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000681578100001)】；

基金：This study was financially supported by program of basic research in Guizhou province (science and technology fund) (foundation of Guizhou Grant no. [2020]1Y215).

语种：英文

外文关键词：Low-carbon competitiveness; DPSIR-Game Theory-TOPSIS model; Evaluation index system; Low-carbon pilot city; Guiyang

摘要：With the gradually prominent contradiction among economic growth, resources, and the environment, low-carbon competitiveness has become the focus of world attention. This study is aimed at exploring the low-carbon competitiveness of a low-carbon pilot city in China. This study constructed an evaluation index system of low-carbon competitiveness with 40 indicators based on DPSIR (Drivers (D)-Pressure (P)-State (S)-Impact (I)-Response (R)) model, determined indicators' weights by Game Theory method, evaluated low-carbon competitiveness combined with TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) method, and analyzed spatiotemporal differences of the study area. The DPSIR-Game Theory Combination Weighting-TOPSIS approach is put forward, which is an overall method to carry out calculations on indicator weights, and it is especially appropriate to assess burgeoning fresh objects. On the basis of the DPSIR-Game Theory Combination Weighting-TOPSIS approach, spatiotemporal differences of low-carbon competitiveness from 2008 to 2017 in Guiyang were compared and analyzed. The state of low-carbon competitiveness had been improved from a weak level to a medium and strong level during 2008 to 2017. However, there was still a big gap compared with the stronger low-carbon competitiveness. In addition, some policies and suggestions are put forward to promote low-carbon competitiveness development, hoping to provide references for the decision making of local governments and provide theoretical supports for low-carbon construction in other countries.